MODULE 03

Deployment & Resource Allocation

What can move from a promising process to a functioning territorial system?

Connect laboratories to territories through logistics, siting, infrastructure, competition, optimization, markets and institutions. Optimal is not automatically deployable.

Open lesson →
Oblique territorial map with dispersed resources, roads, depots, candidate facilities, river, protected areas, town and grid infrastructure.MODULE 03
01

Networks

  • Supply chains and transport
  • Facility siting and scale
  • Infrastructure and markets
02

Choices under scarcity

  • Allocation and competing uses
  • Cascading use
  • LP, MILP and spatial optimization

CURRICULUM

7 lessons

222 min

CONNECTED ROUTES

Learning paths

Bioeconomy 101

A guided first journey through the vocabulary, constraints and full system logic of the bioeconomy.

→

Territorial Bioeconomy

Design bioeconomy systems around place: spatial supply, networks, competing uses, infrastructure, institutions and outcomes.

→

Carbon Removal from Biomass

Evaluate biomass-based carbon removal from resource constraints and conversion yields to durability, additionality and system outcomes.

→

Plastic Waste to Renewable Carbon

Follow plastic wastes through classification, selective conversion, circular carbon choices, deployment constraints and life-cycle outcomes.

→

Sustainable Fuels & SAF

Compare sustainable aviation fuel pathways across feedstocks, process trains, logistics, carbon intensity, cost and scale-up.

→

EVIDENCE LIBRARY

Research, models & tools

A curated starting shelf for this teaching area.

TOOLS

Related tools

LBNL / JBEI

BioSiting

A geospatial platform for exploring U.S. bioeconomy resources, infrastructure and candidate sites.

Use it when
What resources and infrastructure surround a candidate facility location?
Limits
A screening map is not a permit, supply contract or deployability decision.
Inputs, outputs & scope
Inputs
Location, buffer radius, resource layers, infrastructure and pathway choices.
Outputs
Mapped inventories, buffer summaries and downloadable spatial data.
Typical applications
Facility screening, resource context and early TEA/LCA framing.
Pyomo project

Pyomo

An open-source Python environment for formulating and analysing optimization models.

Use it when
How can decisions, objectives and constraints be represented transparently?
Limits
A mathematically optimal result inherits every omission and bias in the model and data.
Inputs, outputs & scope
Inputs
Sets, parameters, variables, objectives, constraints and a compatible solver.
Outputs
Feasible or optimized decisions, objective values and diagnostic information.
Typical applications
LP/MILP allocation, siting, supply chains, scenarios and multi-objective analysis.
U.S. Department of Energy

TECHTEST

A spreadsheet-based early-stage tool combining simplified techno-economic and life-cycle analysis.

Use it when
Which performance factors dominate the potential cost and energy profile of an emerging technology?
Limits
A screening tool does not replace a detailed process design, project finance model or critical review.
Inputs, outputs & scope
Inputs
Technology performance, lifetime, energy and cost assumptions, and a benchmark.
Outputs
Screening-level cost, energy and scenario comparisons.
Typical applications
Early R&D prioritization, benchmark comparison and scenario screening.
CASE STUDIES

Examples from Wang Group

2025Deployment

Assessing the Techno-Economic Feasibility of Bamboo Residue-Derived Hard Carbon

Connects regional bamboo-residue supply, process assumptions and discounted cash flow to a deployability question for hard carbon.

2026Conversion

Ambient-pressure conversion of plastic waste to jet fuel cycloalkanes by tandem hydropyrolysis and vapour-phase hydrogenation

A plastic-to-jet-fuel conversion case for separating molecular feasibility from feedstock supply, hydrogen, certification and deployment questions.

REFERENCES

References & further reading

  1. Hamid Ghaderi, Mir Saman Pishvaee and Alireza Moini (2017). Biomass supply chain network design: An optimization-oriented review and analysis.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.09.027 ↗
  2. Welfle, Gilbert and Thornley (2014). Increasing biomass resource availability through supply chain analysis.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.08.001 ↗
  3. Gital Durmaz and Bilgen (2020). Multi-objective optimization of sustainable biomass supply chain network design.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115259 ↗
  4. Noon and Daly (1996). GIS-based biomass resource assessment with BRAVO.https://doi.org/10.1016/0961-9534(95)00065-8 ↗
  5. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory / Joint BioEnergy Institute (2024). BioSiting Tool v2.Open source ↗
  6. QGIS / OSGeo (2026). QGIS Documentation.Open source ↗
  7. European Commission (2018). Guidance on cascading use of biomass with selected good practice examples on woody biomass.https://doi.org/10.2873/68553 ↗
  8. Keegan, Kretschmer, Elbersen and Panoutsou (2013). Cascading use: a systematic approach to biomass beyond the energy sector.https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1351 ↗
  9. Garcia et al. (2020). Accounting for biogenic carbon and end-of-life allocation in life cycle assessment of multi-output wood cascade systems.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122795 ↗
  10. Hart, Watson and Woodruff (2011). Pyomo: modeling and solving mathematical programs in Python.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12532-011-0026-8 ↗
  11. Pyomo project (2026). Pyomo optimization modeling documentation.Open source ↗
  12. Jarosch et al. (2020). A Regional Socio-Economic Life Cycle Assessment of a Bioeconomy Value Chain.https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031259 ↗
  13. Eason and Cremaschi (2014). A multi-objective superstructure optimization approach to biofeedstocks-to-biofuels systems design.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.02.010 ↗
  14. U.S. Department of Energy (2024). Feedstock-Conversion Interface Consortium: Crosscutting Analysis Research.Open source ↗
  15. Senqiang Qin, Chenghao Yu, Yanghao Jin, Gaoyue Zhang, Wei Xu, Ao Wang, Mengmeng Fan, Kang Sun, Shule Wang (2025). Assessing the Techno-Economic Feasibility of Bamboo Residue-Derived Hard Carbon.https://doi.org/10.3390/app15137113 ↗
  16. Jia Wang, Zedong Zhang, Shule Wang, Ya-Fei Jiang, He Zhou, Wenhui Zhong, Yiyun Zhang, Dongxian Li, Wenjun Zhong, Shiyao Li, Daniel Sanchez, Dingsheng Wang, Jun Li, Jianchun Jiang, Yadong Li (2026). Ambient-pressure conversion of plastic waste to jet fuel cycloalkanes by tandem hydropyrolysis and vapour-phase hydrogenation.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-026-02078-7 ↗